The Luxury Tower Built for New York’s Elite Still Sits Half Empty
Kanebridge News
Share Button

The Luxury Tower Built for New York’s Elite Still Sits Half Empty

Related Companies has struggled to unload its most expensive units at 35 Hudson Yards. Now the developer is offering deep discounts.

By KATHERINE CLARKE
Fri, Jul 14, 2023 9:32amGrey Clock 8 min

When the Related Companies set out to build Hudson Yards, a roughly 28-acre mega-project on Manhattan’s far west side, its goal was lofty: The developer wanted to turn a windswept railyard into the next hot destination for the global elite. That meant building and marketing a brand new neighbourhood with office towers, luxury stores, restaurants and high-end amenities.

The project’s condominium towers—15 and 35 Hudson Yards—were designed to lure moneyed buyers further west than ever before, and set a new benchmark for pricing outside of traditional high-end enclaves, with executives at Related promoting the neighbourhood as “the new Park Avenue.”

Now, roughly a decade after Related broke ground on Hudson Yards, it has struggled to make that vision a reality. At the luxury glass-and-limestone tower 35 Hudson Yards, approximately 50% of the units were still unsold as of the last week of June, more than four years after sales launched, according to an analysis by The Wall Street Journal based on sales recorded with the city’s Department of Finance. Related is slashing prices and offering incentives at the condominium, such as covering buyers’ taxes and closing costs, local agents said.

Recorded sales at 35 Hudson as of late June had closed for an average of 30% less than the original prices filed with the New York state Attorney General’s office, and active listings were discounted by up to 50%, the analysis shows. At least four large units at the building have sold for more than 40% off, records show. A four-bedroom apartment recently traded for $8.5 million, about 46% less than its projected asking price of $15.725 million, records show.

Related’s Sherry Tobak, who heads sales for the two condominiums alongside new development marketing firm Corcoran Sunshine, said the developer had been forced to reassess its expectations at 35 Hudson Yards.

“When we first opened the job, we thought we’d be able to get a higher price,” she said. “The message [from the market] was that we were overreaching a little bit.”

While many developers across the city are cutting prices amid higher interest rates, the discounts being offered at 35 Hudson Yards are bigger than developer concessions in other areas of Manhattan, according to appraiser Jonathan Miller of Miller Samuel.

“The actual housing market is not seeing anywhere near that kind of discount,” Miller said. Related disputed that characterisation, saying the building is performing in line with “its competitive set.”

Priced slightly lower than 35 Hudson, 15 Hudson Yards originally fared better, and is about 90% sold after almost seven years of marketing. Still, some 15 Hudson homeowners are listing their units for less than they paid as they look to resell in a shifting market.

In all, Related still has more than a billion dollars worth of condos left to sell at Hudson Yards, based on the initial pricing, the Journal analysis shows.

The Hudson Yards condos were always going to be a tough sell for Related, which secured the rights to develop the massive railyard site through a roughly $1 billion lease deal with the Metropolitan Transportation Authority in 2010. The far-west location—between 10th Avenue and the West Side Highway—was untested for luxury housing, and required creating an entirely new neighbourhood out of whole cloth. Retail at Hudson Yards now includes high-end stores such as Cartier, Coach and Dior and restaurants including chef José Andrés’ Mercado Little Spain. The project’s more than 10 million square feet of office space is home to tenants such as L’Oréal and Facebook parent company Meta.

To help sell the new neighbourhood it created, Related promised safety—the developer works with a private security firm to police Hudson Yards.

The reception to the new Hudson Yards neighbourhood has been mixed. While some flock there for the shopping, restaurants and tourist destinations like the Edge observatory, others have described the glass skyscrapers as soulless, with little authentic personality.

“It’s a very dramatic area that’s sprung out of nothing,” said Manhattan real-estate agent Donna Olshan. “It’s high-rise buildings, commercial real estate and a mall. It has less of a residential feeling.”

A number of suicides at the Vessel, a tourist attraction that sits at the centre of Hudson Yards, have generated negative press coverage and resulted in the closure of the walkable sculpture. A spokeswoman for Related said the company is evaluating solutions that would allow it to reopen the Vessel.

The first Hudson Yards condo tower, 15 Hudson Yards, was designed to have a downtown feel, said Tobak. Designed by Diller Scofidio + Renfro and Rockwell Group, the 88-story, 285-unit building resembles four interconnecting arcs of glass. The property has about 40,000 square feet of amenities, including a fitness centre, a pool and an open-air terrace wrapped in a 60-foot glass screen wall. Sales launched at the project in September 2016. Initial pricing filed with the attorney general’s office started at $1.92 million for a one-bedroom unit and rose to $32 million for a four-bedroom penthouse.

By contrast, 35 Hudson Yards was designed for a more uptown audience, and is “a little more classic,” Tobak said. Indeed, Related’s own founder and chairman, Stephen Ross, relocated there from another of the company’s projects, the former Time Warner Center at Columbus Circle. Designed by Skidmore Owings & Merrill, 35 Hudson Yards is 92 stories with 143 units. The building has interiors by Tony Ingrao, who also designed Ross’s Time Warner Center penthouse, and comes with amenities such as a private gym and access to the offerings of the Equinox Hotel, which is also in the building. Initial pricing filed with the attorney general started at $5 million for a two-bedroom unit and rose to $59 million apiece for a pair of penthouses.

When 15 Hudson Yards launched sales, it benefited from an upswing in the New York condo market. By the end of the first year of sales, Related had signed contracts for more than $500 million worth of apartments, nearly a third of its projected sellout for the whole tower, property records show. Foreign buyers, particularly from Asia, were a strong component of the buyer pool, thanks to marketing and trade shows Related did there, Tobak said. A large number of those buyers have since rented their units out, according to StreetEasy.

Today, about 30 units remain unsold, recorded sales show, with the building’s higher-priced apartments making up the majority of the leftover inventory. Tobak noted that that number is closer to 25 if signed contracts are factored in.

Sales at 15 Hudson Yards launched in 2016.

Some buyers who purchased early on are now struggling to unload their units in the current market. Ann Cutbill Lenane, a Douglas Elliman real-estate agent who has sold multiple units at Hudson Yards, signed a contract in 2017 to buy a $4.84 million condo for herself at 15 Hudson Yards. Now, with her children out of the house and a need to downsize, she has accepted that she’s unlikely to find a buyer willing to match that price on a resale. She has the unit listed for $4.495 million and said she expects to sell for a loss, especially since Related is currently listing units at a discount, undercutting the price she paid.

She said she feels embarrassed to be a real-estate agent losing money on a piece of property. Still, “I can’t beat myself up,” she said. “You always take a risk when you step into a new product. That’s just the nature of the beast.”

Tobak said that buyers who purchased at the height of the market at 15 Hudson Yards are now facing inevitable market realities, but recommended that they try to wait out the current cycle. “If you hold on for a little while, you’re going to make money,” she said.

When 35 Hudson Yards launched sales in March 2019, it debuted at a higher price point than 15 Hudson in a much less favourable market. “By the time 35 came up, the bloom was off the rose,” said Olshan.

Related signed contracts on about 15 of the 143 units at 35 Hudson in the first year, records show. Then, its efforts were further hampered by the pandemic, which temporarily shut down sales offices across the city. To generate activity, Related temporarily rented units at the building with an option to buy, Tobak said.

Still, Related has struggled to build the momentum needed to meet sales targets at 35 Hudson. Agents said one factor is Related’s proposal to bring a casino to Hudson Yards, which potential buyers worry could draw large crowds and make the area feel tacky. “I’m sure whatever gets built is going to be very tasteful,” said Dan Gotlieb of Digs Realty Group, who has done business at 35 Hudson. “But it’s just an uncertainty right now that’s probably also contributing to the sluggish sales.”

In response to criticism of the casino plan, Related said in a statement: “If we are fortunate enough to be one of the successful bidders for a gaming license, we will deliver a world-class resort with amenities, restaurants, retail and entertainment that will even further elevate the offerings at Hudson Yards and make the experience for the neighbourhood, residents and office tenants even greater than it is today.”

Of the 35 Hudson units currently listed on StreetEasy, many are asking significantly less than the initial pricing. A five-bedroom, roughly 4,600-square-foot unit is asking $13.85 million, 49% less than its original $27 million offering-plan price, records show. A four-bedroom, roughly 3,800-square-foot unit is asking $9.995 million, 43% less than its original projected price.

Olshan likened 35 Hudson to “a big Broadway show that just never took off.”

Real-estate agents with recent deals at 35 Hudson said they have been pleasantly surprised by Related’s level of negotiability. Alex Carini of the Carini Group said his firm recently helped a Brazilian family purchase a $9.95 million condo at the tower, a 37.5% discount from the offering-plan pricing. Related also covered the client’s closing costs, he said. In this market, he said, sellers often give a discount or cover closing costs, but rarely both.

Gotlieb said his clients, onetime renters at 15 Hudson, sat on the sidelines for years as they waited for prices to fall at 35 Hudson. “They wanted a certain kind of product and they weren’t willing to pay $10 million for it,” he said. Ultimately, they secured a four-bedroom, roughly 3,400-square-foot unit for $8.5 million, nearly 46% off the offering plan price, records show.

Retired corporate attorney Grace Kim, 50, said she felt she had “room to negotiate” when she purchased a three-bedroom apartment for her family at 35 Hudson last year.

“Mortgage rates were so high,” Kim said. “Everyone was kind of afraid to jump into the buyer’s market.”

Kim declined to comment on what she paid, but a Related spokesperson said that her unit type typically ranges in price from $6 million to $7.5 million. It is not clear what the apartment was originally priced at.

Kim said she feels comfortable with the investment, given that she plans on living there long term. “I feel like the market is going to come back eventually,” she said.

In the luxury segment of the Manhattan market—the top 10% of deals—the number of closed sales fell 39.6% in the second quarter from the same period of last year, according to a recent report prepared by Miller for Douglas Elliman. The median sales price held relatively steady, ticking up by 3.9% to $6.7 million, during that same period.

Tobak remains optimistic. She said she sees foot traffic picking up at 35 Hudson and has sent contracts out on multiple units in the past few weeks. Factoring in contracts signed, the building is closer to 60% sold, she said. Still, the developer has “less wiggle room than before” in terms of profitability.

“We’re at a decent point,” she said. “Are we making a ton of money? I don’t know.”



MOST POPULAR

From making unpopular decisions to learning when to listen, leaders from five businesses reveal what nobody prepared them for — and how running a company has challenged their expectations.

Technology and semiconductor shares fell sharply as investors questioned the debt financing the AI infrastructure boom and confronted higher rates and Chinese competition.

Related Stories
Lifestyle
SpaceX and Tesla Are Joined at the Hip. A Merger Would Make It Formal.
By Becky Peterson and Corrie Driebusch 22/10/2026
Lifestyle
What Nobody Tells You About Being a CEO | Five minutes on leadership
By 21/10/2026
Lifestyle
Two codes, one fight
By Ruba Jaajaa 21/10/2026
SpaceX and Tesla Are Joined at the Hip. A Merger Would Make It Formal.

Elon Musk is exploring a potential merger between Tesla and SpaceX, a deal that could reshape the future of AI, robotics, autonomous vehicles and space technology. With a combined valuation potentially reaching $3.5 trillion, the move could bring Musk’s vision of an interconnected technology ecosystem closer to reality, although a deal remains uncertain.

By Becky Peterson and Corrie Driebusch
Thu, Oct 22, 2026 5 min

Elon Musk has engineered ties between Tesla TSLA 3.41%increase; up pointing triangle and SpaceX SPCX 7.79%increase; up pointing triangle that are hard to break, and now he wants to fuse them together permanently.

Musk has run both Tesla and SpaceX concurrently over the past two decades, using a schedule that dictated which days he spent focused on each business.

The companies have often shared resources and personnel, signaling their close ties. Last year, SpaceX looked into creating a spacesuit for Tesla’s humanoid robot Optimus, a person familiar with the matter said. Tesla last week showed off its new Roadster, a vehicle featuring SpaceX rocket thrusters that it hopes to soon bring to market.

And in recent months, Musk has repositioned both companies by expanding beyond their core operations toward a shared mission centered on artificial intelligence.

The world’s richest man on Tuesday signaled his interest in tying up SpaceX and Tesla, marking what would be the biggest corporate merger of all time. Because he serves as chief executive of SpaceX and Tesla, Musk said committees of independent directors at both companies are evaluating a possible deal, adding that a transaction might not come to fruition.

The committees will likely evaluate, with lawyers and bankers, how each company would fare in a potential deal and how a deal might best be structured. They then present their conclusions to their respective boards, who typically vote on whether to proceed.

“It’s an odd Kabuki dance where two groups of people are talking and I can’t be in the conversation,” Musk told SpaceX investors on Tuesday in response to an analyst’s question about a potential deal.

For Musk, the merger supports his vision of a world full of autonomous cars, humanoid robots and weekly rocket launches, as well as the data centers and satellites required to keep the whole thing running.

Some investors and analysts said they expect a transaction would be structured as an all-stock deal, with SpaceX potentially paying a modest premium for Tesla shares.

SpaceX, which has a market value of about $2 trillion, said it is seeing sharp growth in revenue across its businesses, which include operating data centers, launching rockets and operating satellite networks such as the internet service Starlink. Tesla is valued at about $1.5 trillion and is expanding its operations beyond its automotive and energy business. Shares in both companies traded higher following the news Tuesday.

The SpaceX Starship and Super Heavy v3 Booster lift off from the launch complex in Starbase, Texas, framed by silhouetted plants in the foreground.
A test flight from the SpaceX launch complex in Starbase, Texas. Steve Nesius/Reuters

Musk’s substantial ownership stakes in both companies, along with voting control at SpaceX, has enabled him to set the deal in motion. Analysts and investors said the deal will probably face regulatory scrutiny internationally, though some see Musk’s close relationship with the Trump administration as an asset to getting approval.

Blurred lines

The companies haven’t said which directors are on the special committees evaluating a potential deal. Several SpaceX and Tesla board members have either personal or business ties to Musk. And like Musk, venture capitalist Ira Ehrenpreis sits on both boards.

In a filing this week, Tesla outlined millions of dollars in business agreements with SpaceX and its subsidiaries last year, including $143 million in car sales to SpaceX, $3.3 million in advertising that it bought on the social-media platform X and $430 million in revenue from the sale of Megapack batteries for SpaceX’s data centers.

The companies also split the cost of resources including the use of Musk’s SpaceX jet and the bill for his personal security, which he runs through a private company.

Employees at both companies routinely move between companies to work on special projects, and some executives have dual roles, including Charles Kuehmann, vice president of materials engineering at both SpaceX and Tesla, and Ashok Elluswamy, the vice president of AI software at Tesla who runs a joint venture with SpaceX called Digital Optimus.

Over the years, Musk has launched new startups within his empire, including brain-implant company Neuralink, underground-tunnel developer the Boring Company and xAI, the AI startup that merged with SpaceX in February.

It is that AI business that Musk thinks can serve a market worth tens of trillions of dollars, justifying the need for a merger.

The business case goes like this: Tesla is developing robotaxis and robots, which it calls “physical AI.” SpaceX is working on the back end of physical AI: the data-center capacity and internet connection required for those robotaxis and robots to operate continuously.

Tesla Optimus humanoid robots and a Cybercab autonomous vehicle on display.
A Tesla Cybercab autonomous driverless vehicle and Optimus humanoid robots. Benjamin Girette/Bloomberg News

“I don’t see what the value of Tesla is if it’s not merged with SpaceX,” said investment adviser Ross Gerber, a former Tesla bull turned critic invested in both companies. “If they don’t merge, the brains of everything that runs Tesla is owned by another company.”

On top of it all, both companies face constraints on the supply chains they need to make this world a reality, particularly when it comes to chips. To address this, Musk earlier this year announced a joint venture between Tesla, SpaceX and Intel to design and manufacture chips in Texas. “The most epic chip-building exercise by far,” he has said.

Musk at the wheel

For Musk, a merger would also solve two problems: demands on his attention and his lack of control at Tesla.

Tesla for years was Musk’s only public company, a status that came with greater scrutiny. There, Musk reports to a public board, as well as individual investors who make up around 30% of Tesla’s voting power, according to FactSet.

The question of Musk’s attention became a particular focus for investors and the board in recent years after he acquired Twitter in 2022 and launched xAI in 2023, and again in 2025 as he spent time in Washington, D.C., running the Department of Government Efficiency in the early months of President Trump’s second term.

As Tesla’s car business suffered in 2025, Musk threatened to take his AI ambitions outside the company if he wasn’t granted 25% voting control. Last November, Tesla shareholders approved a new pay package for Musk, which created a path for him to vastly expand his stake.

As of Sept. 30, Musk owned a roughly 20% stake in Tesla, according to the company’s proxy filing.

The SpaceX IPO gave Musk a different path. When SpaceX went public in June, the deal’s structure enabled him to have more than 80% voting power at the company—so much that he can’t be fired and decisions can’t be made without his support.

If SpaceX acquires Tesla, he will likely stay in control.

MOST POPULAR

Many of the most-important events have slipped from our collective memories. But their impacts live on.

Two coming 2027 models – the first of the “Neue Klasse” cars coming to the U.S. early next year – have been revealed.

Related Stories
Property
NAK founders list $10m waterfront home
By Kirsten Craze 03/07/2026
Lifestyle
BAWAH RESERVE PUTS ANAMBAS ISLANDS ON THE LUXURY MAP
By Jeni O'Dowd 20/08/2025
Property
AUSTRALIA’S HOUSING CRUNCH: MCGRATH REPORT CALLS FOR SUPPLY-LED SOLUTIONS
By Jeni O'Dowd 27/10/2025
0
Your Cart
Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop