‘Full House’ Creator’s L.A. Mansion, Complete With a 35-Foot Waterslide, Relists for $50 Million
Screenwriter and TV producer Jeff Franklin built the lavish residence on the homesite where the 1969 Manson Family murders took place.
Screenwriter and TV producer Jeff Franklin built the lavish residence on the homesite where the 1969 Manson Family murders took place.
A Beverly Hills megamansion, complete with a backyard grotto and a lazy river, that was built by “Full House” creator Jeff Franklin is returning to the market with a multimillion-dollar price cut.
The Southern California home will list on Wednesday for just shy of $50 million, a more than 40% price cut from its initial asking price of $85 million from 2022.
The home has also been occasionally available for rent, asking as much as nearly $250,000 a month.
It sits on the site where Sharon Tate and four others were murdered by the Manson Family in 1969.
That since-demolished home, which Tate and her husband, director Roman Polanski, were renting from music producer Terry Melcher, was torn down in the mid-1990s by a developer, from whom Franklin bought the property before it was completed, according to The Wall Street Journal.
Franklin took the developer’s partially built house and tore it down to the studs to build his own custom home, working with “King of the Megamansion” Richard Landry to do so. The mansion, which has been Franklin’s primary residence for nearly two decades, was completed in 2006.
Dubbed Villa Andalusia, the 21,000-square-foot megamansion combines Andalusian style with South-Asian influences, which was a “fun design challenge,” Landry said in a statement. Listing agent Adam Brawer of Compass likened the home’s design and scale to a palace.
“The interiors combine my love of European architecture and Asian culture, but curated to maximize the California lifestyle,” Franklin wrote in an email.
Amenities throughout the home range from a wood-paneled billiards and poker room to a large aquarium dividing the sitting room and dining room—fish included in the sale.
“It feels like a James Bond villain’s lair,” Brawer said. “Architecturally, it feels like a throwback to a much older time, except it has all the creature comforts of 2025—it’s fully smart.”
With 3.6 acres, the mansion sits on an unusually large lot for Beverly Hills Post Office. It also has wide-ranging views, overlooking the entirety of the city to the Pacific Ocean, and as far as Pasadena on a clear day, Brawer said. Both the property size and its views are what attracted Franklin to it.
“I loved the spectacular views, and the size of the lot allowed me to be creative in designing the unique backyard oasis,” Franklin said.
That backyard oasis is made up of two pools —a wading pool and an infinity pool—which are connected by a lazy river.
Each pool has its own hot tub, with the wading pool’s tucked into a grotto behind three waterfalls. A 35-foot waterslide flows into another waterfall—there are six in total, and there’s also a koi pond, a fire pit and a swim-up bar.
“This is one of the most exciting pools we have ever designed,” Landry said.
Franklin built the home—which has nine bedrooms and 18 bathrooms—with hosting large gatherings in mind, Brawer said.
In addition to the lavish backyard, there are also multiple bars, a game room and a home theater inside, and many of its living spaces lead directly out to the backyard. There’s also two garages, including one underground, and a large motor court, allowing the property to fit at least 20 cars.
Franklin, 70, created the sitcom “Full House” in 1987 and served as showrunner until 1992. He also created its sequel series, “Fuller House,” for Netflix in 2016. Franklin previously owned the San Francisco house that was used for the exterior of the Tanner family home in “Full House.” He remodeled it, also with Landry, and sold it in 2020.
A record-breaking $11 million sale at The Centennial Collection has set a new benchmark for luxury apartment living in Bondi Junction.
As interest rates, inflation and market sentiment fluctuate, investors are being urged to focus on data, not panic.
Australia’s housing affordability crisis is being fuelled by chronic undersupply, planning delays and rising development costs, as politicians continue to focus on the wrong solutions.
Australia’s housing crisis will not be solved by first-home buyer incentives or tax changes alone, with leading property figures warning governments must tackle supply constraints if affordability is to improve.
Speaking at the Kanebridge Quarterly Property Leadership Summit in Sydney last week, expert project marketing specialist Sam Elbanna, property investor and fund manager Paul Miron and property consultant Karla McNeice said that a lack of housing supply remained the central issue facing the market.
Elbanna, Director of CPM Realty with more than 30 years’ experience in project sales, argued that successive governments had focused too heavily on stimulating demand rather than addressing the barriers preventing new housing from being delivered.
“The misconception is that politicians think the way to solve the housing crisis is to drive demand,” he said.
“The reality is that’s not the way. This is a supply-side problem, and it needs to be solved on the supply side.”
Drawing on his experience in project sales, Elbanna said policies designed to help first-home buyers often had unintended consequences, pointing to previous grants that ultimately flowed through to higher property prices.
Instead, he said developers were facing increasing red tape, approval delays and rising costs, which were discouraging new housing supply.
“In the absence of stock, demand exceeds supply,” he said.
Miron, a Co-Founder and Fund Manager of Msquared Capital, said the housing debate had become overly focused on tax policy while overlooking broader structural issues.
He argued that affordability challenges stemmed from a combination of factors, including planning constraints, supply shortages, migration levels and interest rates.
“No-one can be 100 per cent certain on the real reason for property prices is going up,” he said.
“The reason why property prices are higher is a combination of interest rates, lack of supply, migration, vacancy rates and maybe taxes play a role.”
Miron was critical of recent federal housing policy changes, warning they could reduce the number of new homes being built and further constrain supply that was even highlighted in the budget.
He also highlighted the importance of the property sector to the broader economy, noting that residential real estate and related industries employed more than one million Australians.
McNeice, who advises developers on sales strategy and market intelligence, said understanding buyers had become increasingly important as affordability pressures intensified.
While affordability remained a major consideration, she said today’s buyers were focused on value rather than simply price.
“People are looking for value for money,” she said.
She said buyers were increasingly evaluating factors such as transport connections, walkability, nearby amenities and flexible living spaces that could accommodate changing family needs.
“What infrastructure is going on? Can I walk to the shops? Can I meet people at the local cafe?” she said.
The panel also discussed the mounting pressures facing developers, with Elbanna arguing that many projects become financially unviable from the moment a site is purchased.
“The viability of a development happens at the moment the site is bought,” he said.
He said rising construction costs, higher interest rates and overly optimistic feasibility assumptions had left some developers exposed as market conditions changed.
While acknowledging the growing number of smaller and first-time developers entering the market, Elbanna said property development required expertise across finance, construction, marketing and legal disciplines.
“It is actually a business that requires a level of expertise,” he said.
Looking ahead, the panel agreed opportunities remained in the market despite current challenges.
Miron said property should continue to be viewed as a long-term investment and cautioned against trying to time short-term market movements.
McNeice said success would increasingly depend on identifying projects that genuinely met changing buyer expectations.
Elbanna said affordable housing remained achievable, but developers needed to deliver more than just homes.
“We can provide affordable housing in this country,” he said.
“But we’ve got to wrap that affordable housing with the things that people want.”
As Australia’s housing affordability debate intensifies, the panellists agreed on one point: without a meaningful increase in housing supply, demand-side measures alone are unlikely to solve the nation’s property challenges.
From elevated skincare to handcrafted home pieces, this year’s most thoughtful gifts go beyond the expected.
A haven for hedge-fund titans and Hollywood grandees, Greenwich is one of the world’s most expensive residential enclaves, where eye-watering prices meet unapologetic grandeur.