Picture This: More Wealthy Americans Are Tapping the U.K.’s Royal Painters for Personal Portrait
In an era of snapping quick selfies, Britain’s Royal Society of Portrait Painters has seen a 40% increase in the number of U.S. clients.
In an era of snapping quick selfies, Britain’s Royal Society of Portrait Painters has seen a 40% increase in the number of U.S. clients.
An avatar, Instagram selfie or AI clone is enough for some people.
But a growing number of Americans are going old school and having their portraits painted—and many are turning to Britain’s Royal Society of Portrait Painters to create those very analog images.
Founded in 1891, the society―whose members paint all portraits of the royal family―reported a 40% increase in portrait commissions from the U.S. in 2024. Americans now make up 20% of its clients.
“They love the connection to the royal family, and they’re excited about the idea of a trip to the U.K. for sittings,” said Martina Merelli, fine art commissions manager at London’s Mall Galleries.
Mall Galleries is the home of visual arts charity the Federation of British Artists, whose nine art societies include the Royal Society of Portrait Painters.
Merelli heads a portrait commission service that matches clients with artists, and guides them from sittings to completion. Private-commission clients range across age groups and location, though many are Americans based in London.
“Clients tell us, ‘When you have everything, what is it you’re missing?’,” she said. “It’s not vanity, which some people think it is. It’s a love thing. Some clients have multimillion-dollar homes full of art, but none of it means as much as a portrait commission of themselves, a spouse or their children.”
The Royal Society of Portrait Painters includes 46 painters chosen through “a tough selection process,” Merelli said. “We want to preserve the quality the society stands for.” Most members are British.
For Will Cappelletti, a 41-year-old Washington, D.C., entrepreneur, commissioning a portrait was “a bucket-list thing”―though he was skeptical of the idea at first.
“An ex had talked about having it done a few years ago, and I thought it was ridiculous and vain,” he said. “Why would you want to do that?”
But over time, Cappelletti “began to see something else. It’s not about being absorbed with yourself. It’s more about the fact that we live in a world with hundreds of thousands of images of ourselves getting created. They’re impermanent,” he said. “The nice thing about a portrait is that it’s meant to capture you.”
Partly inspired by “classic portraits in public spaces like the Ralph Lauren store on the Upper East Side” of New York, Cappelletti reached out to the portrait society about a commission.
“There is definitely a cultural component to why I chose to get the portrait done in the U.K.,” said Cappelletti, whose personal art collection spans American Impressionism, Greek and Roman antiquities, prints and books.
“The word ‘Royal’ in the title has a punch. I didn’t see a parallel organization in the United States. And most importantly, this commission service exists, with a portrait consultant who gets to know you and your preferences, and has an encyclopedic knowledge of the artists. That sealed it,” he said.
While the society usually recommends an artist based on a client’s input, Cappelletti had one in mind. He had seen a news report on Northumberland artist Frances Bell, who had once painted actor Derek Jacobi.
“I tacked on some personal days to a business trip in Europe, took the train to Northumberland, and was a guest of Frances, her husband and her two kids. She made a shepherd’s pie for dinner the first night and the sittings started the next day.”
Close collaboration with subjects “is extremely important,” said Bell, the artist, from her Northumberland home studio. “The view of themselves, or how people close to them see them, is really important. And when I consult them, they don’t say, ‘Can I be thinner? Can you give me better skin?’ It’s, ‘Please use more of that expression.’”
American clients “love the experience, love the sittings and love the interaction,” she said. “A lot of them are Anglophiles. They like hearing about our slightly different worlds. And I wouldn’t be surprised if Downton Abbey was an influence.
“We are the Royal Society of Portrait Painters, with the king as our patron, and the queen before him. I’m also based in Northumberland, which people love to visit. There’s a whole sense of adventure and oddness about it.”
While Cappelletti estimates he spent about $10,000 dollars on his wood-framed portrait―which now resides in his parents’ home in Ohio―commissions can average from £3,000 to £60,000 (US$3,810 to US$76,200), said Merelli of the Royal Society of Portrait Painters.
“The variables include the size, background, head-and-shoulders versus full length. But for an oil portrait, a good starting point is about £5,000 (US$6,350),” she said. About 80cm x 70 cm (31 inches x 28 inches) is a popular size, though some clients go much larger, Merelli said.
“As a charity, we’re here to preserve portraiture. And I’m here to help clients find the right artists. We send the client a very tailored portfolio of three to five artists, coordinate conversations between them, and finally connect them. It’s a bespoke experience.”
While the society charges no fee for the consultation, “we take a cut of 30%, which is much smaller than a commercial gallery. That supports our annual exhibition,” Merelli said.
Some clients also choose to share photos of themselves instead of taking time for in-person sittings, Merelli said. “Photos also work as people tend to be very busy. Of course at least one sitting makes the experience more interesting, but if needed, they can. We also work with posthumous portraits so photos are required,” she said.
Most clients hang their portraits in living rooms, “so people get to admire them,” Merelli said. “If there’s a long hallway, many will put them there, or over a fireplace, if they have one.”
In 40 years of private commissions, she said, the society “has never had a complaint about a portrait. It takes some adjusting to see yourself as someone else sees you,” Merelli said.
“And today, the artist sometimes has to remind them it’s not Photoshop. Some clients even come back over the years, to see the effects of time on themselves or capture changes in time.”
Cappelletti has no plans to sit for another portrait, “but never say never. If I ever have kids, I’d want them to have this experience,” he said. “From start to finish, this is one of those things you’ve got to do in life.”
From making unpopular decisions to learning when to listen, leaders from five businesses reveal what nobody prepared them for — and how running a company has challenged their expectations.
Technology and semiconductor shares fell sharply as investors questioned the debt financing the AI infrastructure boom and confronted higher rates and Chinese competition.
Elon Musk is exploring a potential merger between Tesla and SpaceX, a deal that could reshape the future of AI, robotics, autonomous vehicles and space technology. With a combined valuation potentially reaching $3.5 trillion, the move could bring Musk’s vision of an interconnected technology ecosystem closer to reality, although a deal remains uncertain.
Elon Musk has engineered ties between Tesla TSLA 3.41%increase; up pointing triangle and SpaceX SPCX 7.79%increase; up pointing triangle that are hard to break, and now he wants to fuse them together permanently.
Musk has run both Tesla and SpaceX concurrently over the past two decades, using a schedule that dictated which days he spent focused on each business.
The companies have often shared resources and personnel, signaling their close ties. Last year, SpaceX looked into creating a spacesuit for Tesla’s humanoid robot Optimus, a person familiar with the matter said. Tesla last week showed off its new Roadster, a vehicle featuring SpaceX rocket thrusters that it hopes to soon bring to market.
And in recent months, Musk has repositioned both companies by expanding beyond their core operations toward a shared mission centered on artificial intelligence.
The world’s richest man on Tuesday signaled his interest in tying up SpaceX and Tesla, marking what would be the biggest corporate merger of all time. Because he serves as chief executive of SpaceX and Tesla, Musk said committees of independent directors at both companies are evaluating a possible deal, adding that a transaction might not come to fruition.
The committees will likely evaluate, with lawyers and bankers, how each company would fare in a potential deal and how a deal might best be structured. They then present their conclusions to their respective boards, who typically vote on whether to proceed.
“It’s an odd Kabuki dance where two groups of people are talking and I can’t be in the conversation,” Musk told SpaceX investors on Tuesday in response to an analyst’s question about a potential deal.
For Musk, the merger supports his vision of a world full of autonomous cars, humanoid robots and weekly rocket launches, as well as the data centers and satellites required to keep the whole thing running.
Some investors and analysts said they expect a transaction would be structured as an all-stock deal, with SpaceX potentially paying a modest premium for Tesla shares.
SpaceX, which has a market value of about $2 trillion, said it is seeing sharp growth in revenue across its businesses, which include operating data centers, launching rockets and operating satellite networks such as the internet service Starlink. Tesla is valued at about $1.5 trillion and is expanding its operations beyond its automotive and energy business. Shares in both companies traded higher following the news Tuesday.
Musk’s substantial ownership stakes in both companies, along with voting control at SpaceX, has enabled him to set the deal in motion. Analysts and investors said the deal will probably face regulatory scrutiny internationally, though some see Musk’s close relationship with the Trump administration as an asset to getting approval.
The companies haven’t said which directors are on the special committees evaluating a potential deal. Several SpaceX and Tesla board members have either personal or business ties to Musk. And like Musk, venture capitalist Ira Ehrenpreis sits on both boards.
In a filing this week, Tesla outlined millions of dollars in business agreements with SpaceX and its subsidiaries last year, including $143 million in car sales to SpaceX, $3.3 million in advertising that it bought on the social-media platform X and $430 million in revenue from the sale of Megapack batteries for SpaceX’s data centers.
The companies also split the cost of resources including the use of Musk’s SpaceX jet and the bill for his personal security, which he runs through a private company.
Employees at both companies routinely move between companies to work on special projects, and some executives have dual roles, including Charles Kuehmann, vice president of materials engineering at both SpaceX and Tesla, and Ashok Elluswamy, the vice president of AI software at Tesla who runs a joint venture with SpaceX called Digital Optimus.
Over the years, Musk has launched new startups within his empire, including brain-implant company Neuralink, underground-tunnel developer the Boring Company and xAI, the AI startup that merged with SpaceX in February.
It is that AI business that Musk thinks can serve a market worth tens of trillions of dollars, justifying the need for a merger.
The business case goes like this: Tesla is developing robotaxis and robots, which it calls “physical AI.” SpaceX is working on the back end of physical AI: the data-center capacity and internet connection required for those robotaxis and robots to operate continuously.
“I don’t see what the value of Tesla is if it’s not merged with SpaceX,” said investment adviser Ross Gerber, a former Tesla bull turned critic invested in both companies. “If they don’t merge, the brains of everything that runs Tesla is owned by another company.”
On top of it all, both companies face constraints on the supply chains they need to make this world a reality, particularly when it comes to chips. To address this, Musk earlier this year announced a joint venture between Tesla, SpaceX and Intel to design and manufacture chips in Texas. “The most epic chip-building exercise by far,” he has said.
For Musk, a merger would also solve two problems: demands on his attention and his lack of control at Tesla.
Tesla for years was Musk’s only public company, a status that came with greater scrutiny. There, Musk reports to a public board, as well as individual investors who make up around 30% of Tesla’s voting power, according to FactSet.
The question of Musk’s attention became a particular focus for investors and the board in recent years after he acquired Twitter in 2022 and launched xAI in 2023, and again in 2025 as he spent time in Washington, D.C., running the Department of Government Efficiency in the early months of President Trump’s second term.
As Tesla’s car business suffered in 2025, Musk threatened to take his AI ambitions outside the company if he wasn’t granted 25% voting control. Last November, Tesla shareholders approved a new pay package for Musk, which created a path for him to vastly expand his stake.
As of Sept. 30, Musk owned a roughly 20% stake in Tesla, according to the company’s proxy filing.
The SpaceX IPO gave Musk a different path. When SpaceX went public in June, the deal’s structure enabled him to have more than 80% voting power at the company—so much that he can’t be fired and decisions can’t be made without his support.
If SpaceX acquires Tesla, he will likely stay in control.
Barnet, in North London, lays claim to two of the country’s most expensive roads to own a home.
Limited to 630 units, Lamborghini’s latest Urus Capsule pushes personalisation further than ever, blending hybrid performance with over 70 bespoke design combinations.