Picture This: More Wealthy Americans Are Tapping the U.K.’s Royal Painters for Personal Portrait
In an era of snapping quick selfies, Britain’s Royal Society of Portrait Painters has seen a 40% increase in the number of U.S. clients.
In an era of snapping quick selfies, Britain’s Royal Society of Portrait Painters has seen a 40% increase in the number of U.S. clients.
An avatar, Instagram selfie or AI clone is enough for some people.
But a growing number of Americans are going old school and having their portraits painted—and many are turning to Britain’s Royal Society of Portrait Painters to create those very analog images.
Founded in 1891, the society―whose members paint all portraits of the royal family―reported a 40% increase in portrait commissions from the U.S. in 2024. Americans now make up 20% of its clients.
“They love the connection to the royal family, and they’re excited about the idea of a trip to the U.K. for sittings,” said Martina Merelli, fine art commissions manager at London’s Mall Galleries.
Mall Galleries is the home of visual arts charity the Federation of British Artists, whose nine art societies include the Royal Society of Portrait Painters.
Merelli heads a portrait commission service that matches clients with artists, and guides them from sittings to completion. Private-commission clients range across age groups and location, though many are Americans based in London.
“Clients tell us, ‘When you have everything, what is it you’re missing?’,” she said. “It’s not vanity, which some people think it is. It’s a love thing. Some clients have multimillion-dollar homes full of art, but none of it means as much as a portrait commission of themselves, a spouse or their children.”
The Royal Society of Portrait Painters includes 46 painters chosen through “a tough selection process,” Merelli said. “We want to preserve the quality the society stands for.” Most members are British.
For Will Cappelletti, a 41-year-old Washington, D.C., entrepreneur, commissioning a portrait was “a bucket-list thing”―though he was skeptical of the idea at first.
“An ex had talked about having it done a few years ago, and I thought it was ridiculous and vain,” he said. “Why would you want to do that?”
But over time, Cappelletti “began to see something else. It’s not about being absorbed with yourself. It’s more about the fact that we live in a world with hundreds of thousands of images of ourselves getting created. They’re impermanent,” he said. “The nice thing about a portrait is that it’s meant to capture you.”
Partly inspired by “classic portraits in public spaces like the Ralph Lauren store on the Upper East Side” of New York, Cappelletti reached out to the portrait society about a commission.
“There is definitely a cultural component to why I chose to get the portrait done in the U.K.,” said Cappelletti, whose personal art collection spans American Impressionism, Greek and Roman antiquities, prints and books.
“The word ‘Royal’ in the title has a punch. I didn’t see a parallel organization in the United States. And most importantly, this commission service exists, with a portrait consultant who gets to know you and your preferences, and has an encyclopedic knowledge of the artists. That sealed it,” he said.
While the society usually recommends an artist based on a client’s input, Cappelletti had one in mind. He had seen a news report on Northumberland artist Frances Bell, who had once painted actor Derek Jacobi.
“I tacked on some personal days to a business trip in Europe, took the train to Northumberland, and was a guest of Frances, her husband and her two kids. She made a shepherd’s pie for dinner the first night and the sittings started the next day.”
Close collaboration with subjects “is extremely important,” said Bell, the artist, from her Northumberland home studio. “The view of themselves, or how people close to them see them, is really important. And when I consult them, they don’t say, ‘Can I be thinner? Can you give me better skin?’ It’s, ‘Please use more of that expression.’”
American clients “love the experience, love the sittings and love the interaction,” she said. “A lot of them are Anglophiles. They like hearing about our slightly different worlds. And I wouldn’t be surprised if Downton Abbey was an influence.
“We are the Royal Society of Portrait Painters, with the king as our patron, and the queen before him. I’m also based in Northumberland, which people love to visit. There’s a whole sense of adventure and oddness about it.”
While Cappelletti estimates he spent about $10,000 dollars on his wood-framed portrait―which now resides in his parents’ home in Ohio―commissions can average from £3,000 to £60,000 (US$3,810 to US$76,200), said Merelli of the Royal Society of Portrait Painters.
“The variables include the size, background, head-and-shoulders versus full length. But for an oil portrait, a good starting point is about £5,000 (US$6,350),” she said. About 80cm x 70 cm (31 inches x 28 inches) is a popular size, though some clients go much larger, Merelli said.
“As a charity, we’re here to preserve portraiture. And I’m here to help clients find the right artists. We send the client a very tailored portfolio of three to five artists, coordinate conversations between them, and finally connect them. It’s a bespoke experience.”
While the society charges no fee for the consultation, “we take a cut of 30%, which is much smaller than a commercial gallery. That supports our annual exhibition,” Merelli said.
Some clients also choose to share photos of themselves instead of taking time for in-person sittings, Merelli said. “Photos also work as people tend to be very busy. Of course at least one sitting makes the experience more interesting, but if needed, they can. We also work with posthumous portraits so photos are required,” she said.
Most clients hang their portraits in living rooms, “so people get to admire them,” Merelli said. “If there’s a long hallway, many will put them there, or over a fireplace, if they have one.”
In 40 years of private commissions, she said, the society “has never had a complaint about a portrait. It takes some adjusting to see yourself as someone else sees you,” Merelli said.
“And today, the artist sometimes has to remind them it’s not Photoshop. Some clients even come back over the years, to see the effects of time on themselves or capture changes in time.”
Cappelletti has no plans to sit for another portrait, “but never say never. If I ever have kids, I’d want them to have this experience,” he said. “From start to finish, this is one of those things you’ve got to do in life.”
Australian shares fell on Thursday as Wall Street weakness, rising oil and persistent rate concerns weighed on most of the market. The S&P/ASX 200 declined 0.72 per cent to 8,702. The All Ordinaries lost 0.66 per cent to finish at 8,897. Mining stocks were hit particularly hard, while real estate also dragged on the index. …
Continue reading “ASX falls 0.7 per cent as miners and property stocks retreat”
Borrowers cannot control the Reserve Bank, but they can control how exposed their household budget is to its next decision. The RBA meets on 29 September with inflation concerns still elevated and major-bank economists increasingly bringing forward their rate-rise calls. Fixed mortgage rates have also been moving, reducing the value of waiting for perfect certainty. …
Continue reading “What mortgage holders should do before the next RBA decision”
OpenAI has shelved the planned launch of GPT-6.1 Astra after internal tests raised concerns about deception and agents acting beyond user authorization, according to The Wall Street Journal. The company says it will investigate the issues and strengthen safety measures before releasing future models.
OpenAI says it is scrapping the release of its next-generation AI model over safety concerns that researchers raised during internal testing, in one of the clearest signs so far that agent misbehavior could stymie the industry’s rapid progression.
The move follows a summer punctuated by reports of artificial-intelligence systems industrywide going rogue, and marks a rare case of a major AI developer ditching a new release because of safety concerns.
The company had planned to launch the model, known as GPT-6.1 Astra, in the coming days or weeks, aiming for an October debut. The model was more capable than the company’s previous models in completing challenging tasks from end-to-end without human assistance, as well as writing.
The company instead will focus on improving the safety of future models, which it expects to be even more capable.
Saachi Jain, OpenAI’s head of safety systems, said in an interview that GPT-6.1 Astra regressed in two areas. Compared with its predecessor, GPT-6 Astra, the model performed poorly on tests measuring alignment, or how well the model adheres to what humans would like it to do. Specifically, GPT-6.1 Astra showed higher levels of deception: It wasn’t always honest about telling users of the actions it did or didn’t take.
Another issue was what OpenAI calls “scope authorization,” meaning that GPT-6.1 Astra would push ahead on a task without asking the user for permission, and would at times reach for external tools and services even if it might be unsafe.
“For anything regarding safety and alignment, there’s a trade off,” Jain said. “You really do need to find what’s the right line between staying within scope, but also avoiding laziness in terms of how the model actually pursues tasks even when it hits friction.”
While GPT-6.1 Astra improved in areas such as “model laziness,” Jain said it didn’t quite meet OpenAI’s bar for safety and alignment, so the company decided not to launch the model publicly.
The announcement comes one day ahead of OpenAI’s annual developer conference in San Francisco. In the past, OpenAI has used the conference as an opportunity to launch new models and services that reduce costs for software developers—a segment the ChatGPT-maker competes with rival AI company Anthropic to win over.
In recent weeks, OpenAI and Anthropic have called on industry partners to slow down the development of cutting-edge AI models and invest in safety standards, noting they will temper the pace of their own internal AI progress.
OpenAI says it is working to investigate a range of agent security incidents that it has discovered in recent months, and address the safety issues underneath them. As part of the work, the company has implemented a new monitoring system to catch AI-agent misbehavior more quickly, and started requiring engineers to use stronger security guardrails for testing its AI systems.
Earlier this summer hundreds of OpenAI’s internal agents, which were tasked with completing a cybersecurity test, ended up hacking into the AI company Hugging Face. Since then, high-profile organizations such as the Australian government and United Nations discovered that OpenAI’s agents used similar, but less extensive, techniques to gain access to their websites.
Many of the publicly known agent-security incidents involved OpenAI’s internal AI models that were never slated for public release.
Last week, OpenAI said it paused training on its most capable AI models after an AI agent slipped through a gap in the company’s internet restrictions to query a public chatbot. The company said its new monitoring systems flagged the incident within 15 minutes, and training on these models remains paused.
GPT-6.1 Astra isn’t one of those models, but a different case, the company said.
“We want to make sure our model development is safe no matter whether that’s in the company, or when we ship it to users,” Jain said. “But when we ship it to users, we have an extremely high bar in terms of safety and alignment.”
While the company decided not to ship GPT-6.1 Astra, it hopes to use the same base model to do additional reinforcement learning runs, and create future generations of its GPT-6 models.
OpenAI plans to conduct several deep dives to identify the root cause of the problems identified in GPT-6.1 Astra, Jain said. The work includes ensuring that OpenAI’s reinforcement learning environments are rewarding the right type of behavior, Jain added, though she noted the company would investigate all stages of model development.
AI companies have begun to draw scrutiny from policymakers and public officials, who are paying attention to the rapid development of the technology. Later this week, a Senate subcommittee is holding a hearing with third party AI researchers titled, “Rogue AI: Securing the Homeland Against AI Agent Attacks.”
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier, a Republican, sued OpenAI in June, claiming that the company and Chief Executive Sam Altman knowingly released an unsafe product and ignored warnings that it could harm users.
In a motion for temporary injunction filed Monday, Uthmeier sought to prevent OpenAI from developing new AI models without third-party approved safeguards, stop ChatGPT from soliciting user engagement and limit the company’s ability to advertise ChatGPT as safe.
Tech companies claim they “cannot stop barreling forward with their potentially civilization-ending endeavors unless they are forced to do so by the government,” Uthmeier said in the filing. “The Florida Attorney General is answering your cry for help.”
An OpenAI spokeswoman said that people want to know AI is being developed safely, “and that starts with what companies like ours do ourselves.”
“Governments have an important role to play in setting robust safety standards for AI, and we’re committed to working with Florida and other states on advancing pragmatic AI policies that apply to the entire AI industry—not just one company,” she said.
A&K Sanctuary unveils Kitirua Plains Lodge, a sustainability-focused luxury property shaped by landscape, local craft and contemporary safari architecture.
Sydney Children’s Hospitals Foundation CEO Kristina Keneally says Australia’s culture of large-scale philanthropy is becoming more sophisticated as Gold Dinner raises $75.5 million for children’s health, research and innovation.