Buy now, pay later: The busiest year in Australian property was also the riskiest
Since the surge in buyer activity, average monthly mortgage payments have increased almost 50 percent, new data has shown
Since the surge in buyer activity, average monthly mortgage payments have increased almost 50 percent, new data has shown
Investment in property might be seen as a long term prospect but the latest figures from CoreLogic suggest not everyone is in it for the long haul. Property sales hit a peak in 2021, with an estimated 549,000 homes sold that year, new data has shown. That means that year, 5.3 percent of all property was bought.
The Australian property data service also revealed a whopping 20 percent of residences were purchased in the past five years. Brisbane had the highest rate of stock turnover in the past five years at 24.6 percent.

The CoreLogic report by head of research Eliza Owen noted that the upswing in buying in 2021 was at one of the riskiest times in the market in recent years, with super sized mortgages to match.
“One could argue then that the many Australians who purchased in 2021 were incentivised into the market at a higher-risk time,” Ms Owen said in the Pulse report. “Average loan sizes reported by the ABS escalated quickly (up almost 18pc over the year), and buying close to the market peak means there may be higher risk of low capital returns or value loss in the face of higher debt costs.”
However, the report said home values had increased by 7.6 percent since the end of 2021. Those who waited a year and purchased during the brief market dip in 2022 fared better, experiencing almost double the capital growth returns. Those who bought since then have been slugged with consecutive interest rate rises as the cash rate increased 13 times over 15 months from 0.1 percent in April 2022, stabilising at 4.35 percent since November 2023.

While Roy Morgan research in April revealed that 30.8 percent or 1,560,000 mortgage holders are at risk of mortgage stress, most are weathering the storm.
“It is likely most recent home buyers are coping with the stark change in mortgage rates and economic conditions,” Ms Owen said in the report.
“In the March Financial Stability Review, the RBA reported around 1 percent of home loans were in negative equity, and APRA reported just 1.6 percent of housing loans had mortgage repayments that were past due.
“Loan to valuation ratios for new mortgages generally trended lower through 2021, and over 90 percent of borrowers had at least a 10 percent deposit for new loans secured that year, providing a buffer against falling home values.”
A record-breaking $11 million sale at The Centennial Collection has set a new benchmark for luxury apartment living in Bondi Junction.
As interest rates, inflation and market sentiment fluctuate, investors are being urged to focus on data, not panic.
Australia’s housing affordability crisis is being fuelled by chronic undersupply, planning delays and rising development costs, as politicians continue to focus on the wrong solutions.
Australia’s housing crisis will not be solved by first-home buyer incentives or tax changes alone, with leading property figures warning governments must tackle supply constraints if affordability is to improve.
Speaking at the Kanebridge Quarterly Property Leadership Summit in Sydney last week, expert project marketing specialist Sam Elbanna, property investor and fund manager Paul Miron and property consultant Karla McNeice said that a lack of housing supply remained the central issue facing the market.
Elbanna, Director of CPM Realty with more than 30 years’ experience in project sales, argued that successive governments had focused too heavily on stimulating demand rather than addressing the barriers preventing new housing from being delivered.
“The misconception is that politicians think the way to solve the housing crisis is to drive demand,” he said.
“The reality is that’s not the way. This is a supply-side problem, and it needs to be solved on the supply side.”
Drawing on his experience in project sales, Elbanna said policies designed to help first-home buyers often had unintended consequences, pointing to previous grants that ultimately flowed through to higher property prices.
Instead, he said developers were facing increasing red tape, approval delays and rising costs, which were discouraging new housing supply.
“In the absence of stock, demand exceeds supply,” he said.
Miron, a Co-Founder and Fund Manager of Msquared Capital, said the housing debate had become overly focused on tax policy while overlooking broader structural issues.
He argued that affordability challenges stemmed from a combination of factors, including planning constraints, supply shortages, migration levels and interest rates.
“No-one can be 100 per cent certain on the real reason for property prices is going up,” he said.
“The reason why property prices are higher is a combination of interest rates, lack of supply, migration, vacancy rates and maybe taxes play a role.”
Miron was critical of recent federal housing policy changes, warning they could reduce the number of new homes being built and further constrain supply that was even highlighted in the budget.
He also highlighted the importance of the property sector to the broader economy, noting that residential real estate and related industries employed more than one million Australians.
McNeice, who advises developers on sales strategy and market intelligence, said understanding buyers had become increasingly important as affordability pressures intensified.
While affordability remained a major consideration, she said today’s buyers were focused on value rather than simply price.
“People are looking for value for money,” she said.
She said buyers were increasingly evaluating factors such as transport connections, walkability, nearby amenities and flexible living spaces that could accommodate changing family needs.
“What infrastructure is going on? Can I walk to the shops? Can I meet people at the local cafe?” she said.
The panel also discussed the mounting pressures facing developers, with Elbanna arguing that many projects become financially unviable from the moment a site is purchased.
“The viability of a development happens at the moment the site is bought,” he said.
He said rising construction costs, higher interest rates and overly optimistic feasibility assumptions had left some developers exposed as market conditions changed.
While acknowledging the growing number of smaller and first-time developers entering the market, Elbanna said property development required expertise across finance, construction, marketing and legal disciplines.
“It is actually a business that requires a level of expertise,” he said.
Looking ahead, the panel agreed opportunities remained in the market despite current challenges.
Miron said property should continue to be viewed as a long-term investment and cautioned against trying to time short-term market movements.
McNeice said success would increasingly depend on identifying projects that genuinely met changing buyer expectations.
Elbanna said affordable housing remained achievable, but developers needed to deliver more than just homes.
“We can provide affordable housing in this country,” he said.
“But we’ve got to wrap that affordable housing with the things that people want.”
As Australia’s housing affordability debate intensifies, the panellists agreed on one point: without a meaningful increase in housing supply, demand-side measures alone are unlikely to solve the nation’s property challenges.
Barnet, in North London, lays claim to two of the country’s most expensive roads to own a home.
The PG rating has become the king of the box office. The entertainment business now relies on kids dragging their parents to theatres.