Why Do Smart Appliances Continue to Be So Dumb?
Connected ovens, microwaves and dishwashers have yet to add much value to homeowners
5 min
Jimmy Hawkins calls himself a home-automation hobbyist. But “hobbyist” is underselling it: He’s a home-automation maniac.
Hawkins has over 200 “smart” devices throughout his Alpharetta, Ga., home. They include run-of-the-mill smart products: locks, lightbulbs, a garage door opener, and vacuums. But also some weird ones: a bidet, mousetrap, toothbrush and curtain rods programmed to close his curtains at a predetermined time.
What does he not have in his house? Lots of smart home appliances.
He and his wife, Jordan, purchased their 4,000-square-foot home in 2022 and bought a smart microwave with a sliding drawer during a kitchen renovation. But after a power outage, they never reconnected it to Wi-Fi.
“Do I really need to get my phone, open an app, hit the ‘open’ button when I’m literally standing in front of the thing and could just push the ‘open’ button?” said Hawkins, 40.
He really does not. It’s like the people who designed his microwave’s smart features have never actually used a microwave.
Smart devices like locks, thermostats and vacuums add real value by addressing a legitimate need, solving a problem or taking over an entire task. But most connected appliances have whizzed right past smart and circled back to dumb. Some offer useful tricks, like preheating your oven remotely, and downloading software updates that add cooking features. But many of the features on these appliances are useless; why would you want to start your clothes washer via app when you have likely just loaded it?
That may be one reason why consumers aren’t using their smart appliances as intended. According to a Wall Street Journal report from Jan. 2023 , only around half of the buyers of smart home appliances from two major manufacturers keep them connected to the internet. LG reported that it was less than half in 2022. Whirlpool said more than half but declined to be more specific. Whirlpool declined to update that data for 2023. Both companies said that consumer concerns over privacy, difficulty connecting and reconnecting devices when the power goes out, and the lack of robust Wi-Fi near their appliances were behind low connection rates.
Owners of these devices have different explanations. There is, they say, a general disinterest in many Wi-Fi-enabled features, like being able to turn on the oven light with their phone app, or starting the dryer while they’re grocery shopping. Take a moment and try to conceive why you’d want or need to do either of those things, besides trying to startle someone who is looking into the oven, or wanting newly dried clothes with a soupçon of mildew.
Consumers, says Hawkins, also don’t want a separate app for each appliance made by different companies. An effective smart-home hub, which lets you completely control all your smart devices from a single place, is still a ways off. Some are getting close, like Home Assistant by Nabu Casa, according to Ed de Tollenaer, who runs the Youtube channel SmartHomeJunkie. But HA is still mostly used by DIY home-automation hobbyists who are adept at programming, de Tollenaer says. A universal smart-device operating standard, called Matter, aims to let smart devices communicate with each other, but until more appliance makers get on board, it’s every app for itself.
If you want to buy a package of high-end home appliances from a single manufacturer that isn’t smart, you’re kind of out of luck. When interior designer and custom cabinet maker Vince Winteregg had a client who wanted high-end appliances without Wi-Fi in his remodeled home, it took Winteregg months to locate brands without it. He found a few individual appliances—a Speed Queen washer and dryer set, a Blue Star professional range and a Wolf steam oven. But he’s still on the hunt for a dumb dishwasher.
“I haven’t found a single client who was excited or looking for Wi-Fi connectivity for appliances,” says Winteregg, based in Clearwater, Fla.
After a surge in 2021, sales of smart home devices into the retail channel plunged then flattened, and the category of devices that includes smart appliances is not expected to see a meaningful rebound in sales until 2025, according to a study by market intelligence firm IDC. This, says Jitesh Ubrani, a research manager for IDC, is partly due to market saturation for smart home devices of all types, a dramatic slowdown in new home sales and construction (the biggest “consumer” of appliances and other smart devices), and the economic downturn since the pandemic.
Ubrani likes his smart vacuum, but otherwise he counts himself among the disenchanted. “A real smart dishwasher would be more like a smart vacuum, where you can sort of set it and forget it. It would load the dishwasher, unload the dishwasher and put away the dishes…I guess what I really want is Rosey the Robot from the Jetsons.” The closest thing to Rosey was “Assign a Task by Whirlpool” which notified you when the washing machine was done and enabled you to send a customised text message to someone…to tell them to put the clothes in the dryer.
Despite a lack of robust consumer interest in smart features, appliance manufacturers continue to embrace them. Data generated by these smart appliances and the apps that live on your phone is fed back to the maker, and can be used to determine how customers are using the product, to identify cross-selling opportunities for paid subscription services (such as recipe app Yummly, which sends recipe instructions to your Whirlpool smart oven—but why?) and to enable software updates and remote diagnostics.
Still, hope springs eternal that one day, the manufacturers will realise that lots of consumers just want an appliance that works and lasts longer than five years before going obsolete.
Hobbyists like Hawkins aren’t convinced that manufacturers will ever give up the holy grail of knowing everything about you and converting it to cash.
“They will probably figure out a way to force you to connect,” says Hawkins. “They really want this data.”
If you’re in the market for household appliances, but want a completely dumb version, you’ll likely have to go for a lower-tier model in any maker’s portfolio of products to find one. If you’re committed to owning a high-end dumb appliance, and you’re willing to spend big, try shopping European, industrial- or commercial-grade manufacturers.
If the model you want only comes smart, keep in mind that most appliances still do their basic job without being connected to the internet, but some do not. One smart-oven maker forces owners to connect to the internet in order to enable the convection roast feature, even though there is a button for it on the oven. Before you buy, make sure that every feature you want works without a connection, or without a one-time connection for a download, which would still force you to download the app, register with your personal info, etc.
Remember that if you do connect your appliance to the internet, the line up of available non-connected features could change in a future software update. Such is the case for both Yummly, which is being sunset in December, and “Assign a Task,” which is no longer available because, one assumes, a Whirlpool washing machine engineer came to his senses.
Lastly, if you want a smart appliance, and you want your smart devices to communicate with each other, look for devices that incorporate the Matter standard. More makers are joining the standard and as smart-appliance functionality inevitably (we hope) improves and becomes more useful, being able to consolidate control on a single hub instead of a half-dozen apps will make life easier. That, after all, is the point of home appliances.
Copyright 2020, Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide. LEARN MORE
From making unpopular decisions to learning when to listen, leaders from five businesses reveal what nobody prepared them for — and how running a company has challenged their expectations.
Technology and semiconductor shares fell sharply as investors questioned the debt financing the AI infrastructure boom and confronted higher rates and Chinese competition.
Elon Musk is exploring a potential merger between Tesla and SpaceX, a deal that could reshape the future of AI, robotics, autonomous vehicles and space technology. With a combined valuation potentially reaching $3.5 trillion, the move could bring Musk’s vision of an interconnected technology ecosystem closer to reality, although a deal remains uncertain.
5 min
Elon Musk has engineered ties between Tesla TSLA 3.41%increase; up pointing triangle and SpaceX SPCX 7.79%increase; up pointing triangle that are hard to break, and now he wants to fuse them together permanently.
Musk has run both Tesla and SpaceX concurrently over the past two decades, using a schedule that dictated which days he spent focused on each business.
The companies have often shared resources and personnel, signaling their close ties. Last year, SpaceX looked into creating a spacesuit for Tesla’s humanoid robot Optimus, a person familiar with the matter said. Tesla last week showed off its new Roadster, a vehicle featuring SpaceX rocket thrusters that it hopes to soon bring to market.
And in recent months, Musk has repositioned both companies by expanding beyond their core operations toward a shared mission centered on artificial intelligence.
The world’s richest man on Tuesday signaled his interest in tying up SpaceX and Tesla, marking what would be the biggest corporate merger of all time. Because he serves as chief executive of SpaceX and Tesla, Musk said committees of independent directors at both companies are evaluating a possible deal, adding that a transaction might not come to fruition.
The committees will likely evaluate, with lawyers and bankers, how each company would fare in a potential deal and how a deal might best be structured. They then present their conclusions to their respective boards, who typically vote on whether to proceed.
“It’s an odd Kabuki dance where two groups of people are talking and I can’t be in the conversation,” Musk told SpaceX investors on Tuesday in response to an analyst’s question about a potential deal.
For Musk, the merger supports his vision of a world full of autonomous cars, humanoid robots and weekly rocket launches, as well as the data centers and satellites required to keep the whole thing running.
Some investors and analysts said they expect a transaction would be structured as an all-stock deal, with SpaceX potentially paying a modest premium for Tesla shares.
SpaceX, which has a market value of about $2 trillion, said it is seeing sharp growth in revenue across its businesses, which include operating data centers, launching rockets and operating satellite networks such as the internet service Starlink. Tesla is valued at about $1.5 trillion and is expanding its operations beyond its automotive and energy business. Shares in both companies traded higher following the news Tuesday.
Musk’s substantial ownership stakes in both companies, along with voting control at SpaceX, has enabled him to set the deal in motion. Analysts and investors said the deal will probably face regulatory scrutiny internationally, though some see Musk’s close relationship with the Trump administration as an asset to getting approval.
Blurred lines
The companies haven’t said which directors are on the special committees evaluating a potential deal. Several SpaceX and Tesla board members have either personal or business ties to Musk. And like Musk, venture capitalist Ira Ehrenpreis sits on both boards.
In a filing this week, Tesla outlined millions of dollars in business agreements with SpaceX and its subsidiaries last year, including $143 million in car sales to SpaceX, $3.3 million in advertising that it bought on the social-media platform X and $430 million in revenue from the sale of Megapack batteries for SpaceX’s data centers.
The companies also split the cost of resources including the use of Musk’s SpaceX jet and the bill for his personal security, which he runs through a private company.
Employees at both companies routinely move between companies to work on special projects, and some executives have dual roles, including Charles Kuehmann, vice president of materials engineering at both SpaceX and Tesla, and Ashok Elluswamy, the vice president of AI software at Tesla who runs a joint venture with SpaceX called Digital Optimus.
Over the years, Musk has launched new startups within his empire, including brain-implant company Neuralink, underground-tunnel developer the Boring Company and xAI, the AI startup that merged with SpaceX in February.
It is that AI business that Musk thinks can serve a market worth tens of trillions of dollars, justifying the need for a merger.
The business case goes like this: Tesla is developing robotaxis and robots, which it calls “physical AI.” SpaceX is working on the back end of physical AI: the data-center capacity and internet connection required for those robotaxis and robots to operate continuously.
“I don’t see what the value of Tesla is if it’s not merged with SpaceX,” said investment adviser Ross Gerber, a former Tesla bull turned critic invested in both companies. “If they don’t merge, the brains of everything that runs Tesla is owned by another company.”
On top of it all, both companies face constraints on the supply chains they need to make this world a reality, particularly when it comes to chips. To address this, Musk earlier this year announced a joint venture between Tesla, SpaceX and Intel to design and manufacture chips in Texas. “The most epic chip-building exercise by far,” he has said.
Musk at the wheel
For Musk, a merger would also solve two problems: demands on his attention and his lack of control at Tesla.
Tesla for years was Musk’s only public company, a status that came with greater scrutiny. There, Musk reports to a public board, as well as individual investors who make up around 30% of Tesla’s voting power, according to FactSet.
The question of Musk’s attention became a particular focus for investors and the board in recent years after he acquired Twitter in 2022 and launched xAI in 2023, and again in 2025 as he spent time in Washington, D.C., running the Department of Government Efficiency in the early months of President Trump’s second term.
As Tesla’s car business suffered in 2025, Musk threatened to take his AI ambitions outside the company if he wasn’t granted 25% voting control. Last November, Tesla shareholders approved a new pay package for Musk, which created a path for him to vastly expand his stake.
As of Sept. 30, Musk owned a roughly 20% stake in Tesla, according to the company’s proxy filing.
The SpaceX IPO gave Musk a different path. When SpaceX went public in June, the deal’s structure enabled him to have more than 80% voting power at the company—so much that he can’t be fired and decisions can’t be made without his support.
If SpaceX acquires Tesla, he will likely stay in control.
French luxury-goods giant’s results are a sign that shoppers weren’t splurging on its collections of high-end garments in the run-up to the holiday season.
A luxury lifestyle might cost more than it used to, but how does it compare with cities around the world?
