Even in Its Priciest Neighbourhoods, Buying in Rome Remains a Bargain
Compared with other luxury housing markets in Europe, buyers get more bang for their buck in Italy’s capital
Compared with other luxury housing markets in Europe, buyers get more bang for their buck in Italy’s capital
Gianluca and Selene Santilli have all of Rome at their feet.
Their four-storey penthouse apartment in an early 20th-century villa sits atop a hill in the Italian capital’s Parioli district. With 360-degree views from sitting rooms and outdoor areas, the property provides glimpses of the dome of St. Peter’s Basilica, residential Parioli’s towering pine trees and the winding course of the Tiber River.
The 4,010-square-foot home has free-standing pavilion-like spaces that suggest an urban compound more than an individual apartment. Now, after nearly two decades in the custom-designed space, the couple have listed the four-bedroom unit with Italy/Sotheby’s International Realty. It has an asking price of $6.1 million.
A similar level of luxury in Milan, Italy’s financial and fashion capital, would cost a lot more, says Gianluca, a 67-year-old attorney. “Rome is cheap,” he says, of both the homes for sale and for rent.
Gianluca and Selene, a 64-year-old office manager, priced their home at just under $1,500 a square foot. In Milan, by comparison, a smaller three-bedroom, 2,750-square-foot unit in a decade-old high-rise, with lavish views and similarly upscale fittings, is listed for $6.445 million, or about $2,350 a square foot.
Roman-style luxury was once associated with the gargantuan villas of ancient emperors and the frescoed palaces of Baroque-era princes, but these days it conjures up another phrase: a bargain.
Rome’s average home prices, as of August, were about $350 a square foot—less than Italy’s Florence and Bologna, and around a third less than Milan, according to Immobiliare.it, a real-estate website.
Prices in Rome peaked in 2007, and the city has been slow to encourage new development and investment, says Antonio Martino, the Milan-based real-estate advisory leader for PwC Italy. In Milan, on the other hand, an increase in supply has been outpaced by a greater increase in demand, he says.
A one-bedroom apartment in Rome is far more affordable than the average for major European cities, coming in below Barcelona, Amsterdam and Vienna, according to an affordability index compiled by Savills, the international real-estate company, which analyzed apartments outside of the historic city centres.
An average-earning Roman might need only four years’ salary to buy the apartment, while a Parisian would likely need more than twice that, according to Savills.

Rome’s luxury sector is showing new signs of life, outpacing the rest of the market, says Danilo Orlando, managing director of Savills Residential Italy. Comparing 2023 sales of homes over $1.1 million with prepandemic 2019 levels, he says, prices in Rome have increased 4% while the number of luxury-level transactions has risen 3.6%. Overall real-estate transactions were up 3% in the second quarter of this year, compared with a year earlier, says PwC’s Martino.
Orlando says that residential luxury sales in Rome are traditionally concentrated in three nearby areas that are the city’s most expensive: The Centro Storico, or the historic center, is where centuries-old palaces are often broken up into lavish multi-bedroom apartments. Parioli is a hilly district known for its Midcentury Modern flare. And a short walk away is Trieste, which has clusters of early 20th-century apartment buildings that vie in splendour with their Baroque counterparts down in the centre.
Centro Storico is by far the most expensive, says Orlando, with average prices in the premium sector reaching $1,493 a square foot in 2023. Luxury units in Parioli average about $950 a square foot, while those in Trieste are about $900 a square foot.
Tourists may flock to Centro Storico’s celebrated sites, like the Trevi Fountain, or make their way through the Villa Borghese, a massive landscaped garden that serves as a green space for both Parioli and Trieste. But they are likely to miss the three districts’ prime residential areas, which can seem discreet, if not outright hidden.
Centro Storico’s Via Giulia, running just east of the Tiber, and Via Margutta, tucked under Piazza del Popolo, are hard-to-find streets if you’re not looking for them. Via Giulia was once the address of choice for Roman nobles, and it can still lay claim to being one of the city’s most prestigious streets. A two-bedroom Via Giulia triplex, located in a building dating back to the 16th century and outfitted with vintage coffered ceilings, is listed with Italy/Sotheby’s, with an asking price of $2 million.
The centrepiece of Trieste is the Coppedè quarter, a neighbourhood of towering 1910s and ’20s apartment buildings, decorated with Moorish arches and ghoulish gargoyles, and built around a storybook-like frog fountain. Conceived by an eccentric Florentine-born architect named Gino Coppedè, the quarter combines Art Nouveau elements with a range of historical styles.
Exclusive RE/Christie’s International Real Estate has a well-maintained, four-bedroom Coppedè listing for $3.56 million. Original details in the 3,770-square-foot home include stained-glass windows, mosaic tile floors and painted ceilings.
Parioli, with its many steep streets, is a bit more remote, while Trieste is flatter and more urban. For many luxury-minded Romans, a fine compromise is Pinciano, a neighborhood beneath the heart of Parioli that is as rarefied as its hilly neighbour but as accessible as Trieste.
In 2007, Dr. Claudio Giorlandino, a Roman gynaecologist, created a sprawling family home in a Pinciano building that had been commissioned just before World War I, he says, by a member of the House of Savoy, then the Kingdom of Italy’s ruling family. Designed by a noted Venetian-Jewish architect and decorated with marble recovered from a Palladian villa in northeast Italy, the building has a small number of units, with Giorlandino’s 6,200-square-foot apartment taking up a whole floor.
“I love the elegance and the extremely refined, aristocratic atmosphere,” Giorlandino, now 70, says of his neighbourhood, which borders the Villa Borghese.
Now that two of his three children are grown and living on their own, he has listed the home with Exclusive RE/Christie’s for $6.89 million.
Rome’s three most expensive districts can seem like a self-contained world, with residents moving around between them. Giorlandino, who relocated from the Centro Storico to Pinciano, is now thinking about moving back to the historic centre. The Santillis, who moved to Parioli from Trieste, are considering looking for a more compact rental still in Parioli, which they say feels insulated from the Italian capital’s notorious traffic.
“We have the historic centre nearby, but we are not in the chaos of the centre,” says Gianluca Santilli, adding that he considers “the jewels” of his unique penthouse to be the home’s three parking spaces.
American buyers, traditionally drawn to the Centro Storico, are also open to Parioli and to the Aventine Hill, a very steep, purely residential area on the edge of the historic centre, says Diletta Giorgolo, head of residential at Italy/Sotheby’s.
Known for its jaw-dropping views of the Vatican and for its sedate, almost suburban quality, the Aventino, as Italians call it, may be Rome’s most elusive address. Premium listings rarely come up for sale.
Lionard Luxury Real Estate currently has a ¼-acre Aventino compound, with an early 20th-century 10,800-square-foot villa, listed for $22.2 million.
A new Centro Storico development proved too good to pass up for Delphine Surel-Chang, a U.S.-born student studying business in Rome, and her French mother, former actress and investor Francoise Surel, who will also relocate.
The two are putting the finishing touches on their new homes in the Palazzo Raggi, where 21st-century details are being installed in a renovated 18th-century palazzo situated between the Trevi Fountain, Piazza Navona and the Pantheon. This summer, Surel purchased a 1,460-square-foot, two-bedroom apartment for herself, and Surel-Chang says her parents helped her buy a 645-square-feet one-bedroom. The units cost $1.88 million and about $944,000, respectively. They are set to move in later this year.
Surel-Chang, 20, says she loves how the project’s contemporary elements—which she and her mother, 60, are augmenting with kitchens and bathrooms from Italy’s sleek Boffi brand—are housed in a classical setting. And she appreciates amenities like a concierge and home automation, allowing residents to control temperature, lighting and appliances via app.
She was able to customise her unit’s interiors, she says, by drawing inspiration from her two favorite local hotels, the Bulgari Hotel Roma and Six Senses Rome. She plans to furnish the unit, where she says they will stay for at least three years, with Italian Midcentury Modern pieces.
The duo bought the apartments—which are a five-minute walk from Via Condotti, Rome’s premier shopping street—for between $1,200 and $1,500 a square foot, using Italy/Sotheby’s, which also helped develop the project.
The apartments can seem like a bargain compared with similarly situated units in other major cities. For instance, a two-bedroom, 2,025-square-foot apartment in London’s Mayfair district—a five-minute walk from Bond Street, Via Condotti’s U.K. shopping district equivalent—is asking nearly $10,000 a square foot.
Affordability played a part in their choice of the Eternal City, says Surel-Chang. They considered relocating to Paris, she says, but soon realised that “for the price of an apartment in Paris, we can afford two in Rome.”
As housing drives wealth and policy debate, the real risk is an economy hooked on growth without productivity to sustain it.
Limited to 630 units, Lamborghini’s latest Urus Capsule pushes personalisation further than ever, blending hybrid performance with over 70 bespoke design combinations.
As housing drives wealth and policy debate, the real risk is an economy hooked on growth without productivity to sustain it.
For decades, Australia has leaned into its reputation as the lucky country. But luck, as it turns out, is not an economic strategy.
What once looked like resilience now appears increasingly fragile. Beneath the surface of rising property values and steady headline growth, the Australian economy is showing signs of strain that can no longer be ignored.
Recent data paints a sobering picture. Australia has recorded one of the largest declines in real household disposable income per capita among advanced economies.
Wages have failed to keep pace with inflation, meaning many Australians are working harder for less. On a per capita basis, income growth has stalled and, at times, reversed.
And yet, on paper, things still look relatively solid. GDP is growing. Unemployment remains low. But that growth is increasingly being driven by population expansion rather than productivity.
More people are contributing to output, but not necessarily improving living standards.
That distinction matters.
For years, Australia’s economic success rested on a powerful combination: a once-in-a-generation mining boom, a credit-fuelled housing market, strong migration and a property sector that rarely faltered. Between 1991 and 2020, the country avoided recession entirely, building enormous wealth in the process.
But much of that wealth is tied to property. Around two-thirds of household wealth sits in real estate, inflated by leverage and sustained by demand. It has worked, until now.
The problem is the supply side of the economy has not kept up.
Housing supply is falling behind population growth. Rental vacancies are near record lows.
Construction firms are collapsing at an elevated rate. At the same time, massive infrastructure pipelines are competing with residential projects for labour and materials, pushing costs higher and delaying delivery.
The result is a system under pressure from all angles.
Despite near full employment, productivity growth has stagnated for years. In simple terms, Australians are putting in more hours without generating more output per hour. The economy is running faster, butgoing nowhere.
Meanwhile, government spending continues to expand. Public debt is approaching $1 trillion, with spending now accounting for a record share of GDP.
The gap between spending and revenue has been filled by borrowing for decades, adding further pressure to an already stretched system.
This is where the uncomfortable question emerges.
Has Australia become too reliant on a model driven by rising property values, expanding credit and population growth?
As asset prices rise, households feel wealthier and borrow more. Banks lend more. Governments collect more revenue. Migration fuels demand. The cycle reinforces itself.
But when productivity stalls and debt outpaces real income, the system begins to depend on constant expansion just to stay stable.
It is not a collapse scenario. But it is not particularly stable either.
Nowhere is this more evident than in housing.
The National Housing Accord targets 1.2 million new homes over five years, yet current completion rates are well below that pace. With approvals falling and construction costs rising, the gap between supply and demand is widening, not narrowing.
Housing is also one of the largest contributors to inflation, with costs rising sharply across rents, construction and utilities. Yet the private sector, from small investors to major developers, is struggling to make projects stack up in the current environment.
This brings the policy debate into sharper focus.
Tax settings such as negative gearing and capital gains concessions have undoubtedly boosted demand over the past two decades. But they have also supported supply. Removing them may ease prices briefly, but risks deepening the supply shortage over time.
That is the paradox.
Policies designed to make housing more affordable can, in practice, make the shortage worse if they discourage development. The optics may appeal, but the economics are far less forgiving.
It is also worth remembering that most property investors are not institutional players. The majority own just one investment property. They are, in many cases, ordinary Australians using real estate as their primary wealth-building tool.
Undermining that system without replacing it with a viable alternative risks unintended consequences, from reduced supply to higher rents and increased inflation.
So where does that leave Australia?
At a crossroads.
The country can continue to rely on population growth and rising asset prices to drive economic activity. Or it can shift towards a model built on productivity, innovation and sustainable growth.
The latter is harder. It requires structural reform, long-term thinking and political discipline.
But it is also the only path that leads to genuine, lasting prosperity.
The question is no longer whether Australia has been lucky.
It is whether it can evolve before that luck runs out.
Paul Miron is the Co-Founder & Fund Manager of Msquared Capital.
An opulent Ryde home, packed with cinema, pool, sauna and more, is hitting the auction block with a $1 reserve.
Rugged coastal drives and fireside drams define a slow, indulgent journey through Scotland’s far north.